Scores
Significance scores (manual importance) and activity scores (automatic relationship health).
Two scoring systems
Cardmunk provides two complementary ways to measure how important a contact is to you:
Significance
You set it manually. A 1–10 rating of how important this person is to you. Think of it as a priority ranking.
Activity
Computed automatically. A 0–100 score reflecting how actively you communicate with this person, based on interaction history.
Significance scores
Significance is your personal importance rating for a contact, on a scale of 1 to 10. It’s entirely manual — you decide what each number means to you.
Open any contact's Overview tab
Set your rating (1–10)
Using significance
- Sort contacts by significance to see your most important people first
- Star indicators appear on the contacts list for rated contacts
- Dashboard highlights contacts with high significance but low activity (people you care about but haven’t talked to recently)
Activity scores
Activity scores measure how “alive” a relationship is, based on your interaction history. They are computed automatically using a time-decay model.
How it works
Interaction weights
Not all interactions are equal. A face-to-face meeting (5.0×) counts more than a quick chat message (1.0×). Calls and video calls fall in between (3.0×).
Time decay
Recent interactions count more. Scores decay with a 90-day half-life — an interaction from 90 days ago is worth half as much as one from today.
Diminishing returns
Rapid-fire chat messages within a 30-minute window score at a reduced rate, so a burst of Slack messages doesn’t inflate the score artificially.
Default interaction weights
Tip
Using scores together
The real power comes from combining both scores. The dashboard highlights contacts where there’s a mismatch:
High significance, low activity
Someone you rated as very important but haven’t interacted with recently. A gentle nudge to reach out.
High activity, no significance
Someone you interact with frequently but haven’t rated yet. Consider setting their significance score.